Excerpt: Coming to the case of prosecution for the offences under Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry prohibition Act, the alleged payment of dowry of Rs.50.00 lakhs cash and presentation of gold of 200 tulas and registration of property in the name of the second respondent took place at the time of marriage, i.e. on 27.04.2016 and the later … Continue reading korimerla videesha vs state of ap
Andhra High Court Vadde Rama Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 25 August, 1989 Equivalent citations: 1990 CriLJ 1666 Bench: B Rao JUDGMENT (1) This is an appeal filed by the sole accused against his conviction under Section 304-B I.P.C. and sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years. (2) The facts in brief as spoken … Continue reading Vadde Rama Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Excerpt: Andhra High Court Bandhana Deepika vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By ... on 28 June, 2018 THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.11937 of 2017 28.06.2018 Bandhana Deepika.... Petitioner/Accused No.3 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, For the … Continue reading 498a cannot be applied on non- relatives
Excerpt: The learned Counsel also would submit that except the vague evidence of P.W. 7, there is no other evidence relating to the demand of money and even otherwise, this demand of money had been only for the purpose of having some more accommodation and nothing more and nothing beyond, and it may not amount … Continue reading Atchutuni Saibaba And Ors. vs State
Excerpt: None of the neighbours were examined. Apart from this aspect of the matter, it is pertinent to note that none of the persons concerned with the Panchayat had been examined. The crucial aspect which would suggest that there would have been harassment in relation to demand of some additional dowry, i.e., payment of Rs. … Continue reading neighbours and panchayatdars not examined… 498a acquital.