Category: 506 quash

Bhanu Singh Nayal vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another

by 498anlr, posted in 323 IPC, 482 crpc, 498a, 498a quash, 506 IPC, 506 quash, judgments, uttarakhand high court

Excerpt: Uttarakhand High Court Bhanu Singh Nayal vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another on 26 April, 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Crl. Misc. Application No.321 of 2011 (U/s 482 Cr.P.C.) Bhanu Singh Nayal ....... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another ...... Respondents Dated: April 26, 2019 Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate, … Continue reading Bhanu Singh Nayal vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another

498a acquittal qua relatives by bangalore district court

by 498anlr, posted in 498a, 506 IPC, 506 quash, DP3, DP4, judgments

Excerpt: Bangalore District Court R.T.Nagar Police Station vs Accused No.2 To 7 Are On on 3 October, 2018 IN THE COURT OF LVI ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE      PRESENT: SRI.HATTIKAL PRABHU.S.                                               M.A.,LL.B(Spl) LL.M., DATED THIS THE    03rd DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018 Serial   Number   of   the    C.C.27293/2011 case Name   of   the State by Police Inspector,   complainant  R.T.Nagar Police station  (Reptd.   by   Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor ) Name   of   the   accused 1) Shivakumar … Continue reading 498a acquittal qua relatives by bangalore district court

Different dowry articles to different people… primafacie improbable… hence quashed qua relatives…

by 498anlr, posted in 120B IPC, 406 IPC, 406 quash, 498a, 498a quash, 506 IPC, 506 quash, judgments, Punjab and Haryana High court, quash against relatives

Punjab-Haryana High Court Baljit Singh And Anr vs Karamjit Kaur on 10 October, 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (i) CRM No.M-11705 of 2013 (O&M) Baljit Singh and another ...Petitioners VERSUS Karamjit Kaur ...Respondent (ii) CRM No.M-15382 of 2013 (O&M) Balwinder Kaur @ Davinder Kaur ...Petitioner VERSUS Karamjit Kaur ...Respondent … Continue reading Different dowry articles to different people… primafacie improbable… hence quashed qua relatives…

by 498anlr, posted in 212 crpc, 506 IPC, 506 quash, 509 quash, judgments

Excerpt: For accused to face trial for an offence there has to be grave suspicion and not mere suspicion or an allegation. In the present case apart from bald allegations, evidence does not reveal grave suspicion of the petitioner having committed the offence under Section 506 or 509 IPC. Delhi High Court Hari Kishen Sharma vs State & … Continue reading

R.Jeeva @ Rajesh vs State

by 498anlr, posted in 109IPC, 161 crpc, 212 crpc, 397 crpc, 401 crpc, 406 IPC, 406 quash, 498a, 506 IPC, 506 quash, crpc468, judgments, section 9 hma

Excerpt: JUDGEMENTS CITED: 1.(2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 1015 (Manju Ram Kalita v. State of Assam) 2. (i)(2008) 3 MLJ (Crl) 776 (Rajan v. State rep. by Inspector of Policer, Central Crime Branch, Tiruppur and (ii)(2008) 3 MLJ (Crl) 929 (Prakash Bachraj Jain and another v. Mani Textile Traders rep. by its Partner, Babu (a) Boommannan, Komarapalayam, Tiruchengodu … Continue reading R.Jeeva @ Rajesh vs State