Hari Krishnan vs State Represented By Assistant

Excerpt The charge under Section 498(A) I.P.C. has not been made out, since there is no convincing evidence to show that there had been a demand of dowry and the appellants have been continuously making such demand and there is no proximate cause for the case to attract the ingredients of Section 498(A) I.P.C.   JUDGEMENTS CITED: GIRIDHAR SHANKAR … Continue reading Hari Krishnan vs State Represented By Assistant