498a and 304b discharge on suspicion vs grave suspicion…

Excerpt: from the statement, two views are possible, therefore, view favouring the accused has to be accepted State vs . Shyam Singh And Ors. on 14 February, 2013 Author: Sh. Vikas Dhull State Vs. Shyam Singh and Ors. FIR No: 216/10 IN THE COURT OF VIKAS DHULL, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-01, DWARKA COURTS, DELHI SC NO: … Continue reading 498a and 304b discharge on suspicion vs grave suspicion…

Hari Krishnan vs State Represented By Assistant

Excerpt The charge under Section 498(A) I.P.C. has not been made out, since there is no convincing evidence to show that there had been a demand of dowry and the appellants have been continuously making such demand and there is no proximate cause for the case to attract the ingredients of Section 498(A) I.P.C.   JUDGEMENTS CITED: GIRIDHAR SHANKAR … Continue reading Hari Krishnan vs State Represented By Assistant

neighbours and panchayatdars not examined… 498a acquital.

Excerpt: None of the neighbours were examined. Apart from this aspect of the matter, it is pertinent to note that none of the persons concerned with the Panchayat had been examined. The crucial aspect which would suggest that there would have been harassment in relation to demand of some additional dowry, i.e., payment of Rs. … Continue reading neighbours and panchayatdars not examined… 498a acquital.