Hari Krishnan vs State Represented By Assistant

Excerpt The charge under Section 498(A) I.P.C. has not been made out, since there is no convincing evidence to show that there had been a demand of dowry and the appellants have been continuously making such demand and there is no proximate cause for the case to attract the ingredients of Section 498(A) I.P.C.   JUDGEMENTS CITED: GIRIDHAR SHANKAR … Continue reading Hari Krishnan vs State Represented By Assistant

Prem Dass And Anr. vs State Of H.P

Exceprt:Recording of the FIR on 10-6-1987, whereas the occurrence took place on 6-6-1987 and that too when the police called P. W. 1 to the police station where P. W. 1 was alleged to have made the statement Ex. PA on 10-6-1987. No explanation for this delay has been made. This aspect of the matter … Continue reading Prem Dass And Anr. vs State Of H.P

Eloping with girl friend not cruelty under 304-b

Excerpt:  any amount provided by the parents of a bride to the other party for business purpose is not included under the definition of 'dowry'. 11. From the evidence, it is established that both the respondents eloped from the house since long back and therefore, there was no case for them to harass the deceased. Further, … Continue reading Eloping with girl friend not cruelty under 304-b