Skip to content

Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation

  • Home
  • Welcome
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • 498a acquittal
  • 498a quash
  • 304b acquittal
  • quash against relatives
  • 498a discharge

Fight against Legal Terrorism

  • Home
  • Welcome
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • 498a acquittal
  • 498a quash
  • 304b acquittal
  • quash against relatives
  • 498a discharge

Welcome

This Website is about our struggle against biased laws of India which Supreme Court of India Termed as Legal Terrorism

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Recent Posts

  • (no title)
  • (no title)
  • (no title)
  • (no title)
  • Unless the dying declaration is wholly reliable, voluntarily free from all doubts and truthful and further the maker was in fit medical condition, it can not be the basis for conviction. 

Recent Comments

RSS MyNation KnowledgeBase

  • How to assess quantum of compensation in motor accident case of child death?
  • Under which circumstances Session court or High court can grant anticipatory bail to accused for limited period of time?
  • Whether court can permit the accused’s identification by victim in the court by showing his photograph to her?
  • How to appreciate evidence of SDR, CDR and Tower location in Criminal case?
  • Can the court charge the accused for an offence under POCSO Act if she fails to report to the police about a crime against a child?
  • Whether offence of extortion is made out against accused if there is no averment in FIR that complainant has delivered any valuable assets to accused?
  • Can the court declare a document invalid if there is an erroneous description of a person or a thing in a written instrument?
  • Discharge in 498A, Vague and no specific allegations
  • Whether court should allow time barred amendment of plaint?
  • Should the court reject an application for amendment of plaint if a new suit on the amended claims would be barred by limitation on the date of application?

Archives

  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Blog Stats

  • 18,162 hits

Recent Posts: Defamation

Shybimon vs Haridas

  Kerala High Court Shybimon vs Haridas on 22 March, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2918 of 2009() 1. SHYBIMON, S/O.DIVAKARAN, PUTHEN … Petitioner Vs 1. HARIDAS, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, PUTHAN … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.B.PRAMOD For Respondent :SRI.R.AZAD BABU The Hon’ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR Dated :22/03/2010 O R D E R […]

M.K.Varghese Cor Episcopa vs State Of Kerala

Excerpt: PARAGRAPH NO 19. Whether the petitioner is entitled to get the benefit of any of the exceptions provided to Section 499 I.P.C, whether he had made the statements in the writ petition in good faith for protection of his interest etc. are matters which cannot be decided by this Court in this petition filed […]

Cause of action is date of offence not date of acquittal

Excerpt: Punjab-Haryana High Court Yashvant Malhotra vs A.K.Sinha on 20 December, 2019 CRM-M-1992-2017(2 petitions) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) Crl. Misc. No. M-11992-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: December 20, 2019 Yashvant Malhotra ….. PETITIONER(s) Versus A.K. Sinha ….RESPONDENT(s) Crl. Misc. No.M-13649 of 2017 (O&M) J.N. Parsad ….. PETITIONER(s) […]

Exceptions to defamation are a matter of trial

Excerpt: “First Exception – Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published.- It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a […]

Mohammed Abdulla Khan vs Prakash K

Excerpt: Where defamatory matter is printed (in a newspaper or a book etc.) and sold or offered for sale, whether the owner thereof can be heard to say that he cannot be made vicariously liable for the defamatory material carried by his newspaper etc. requires a critical examination. 27. Each case requires a careful scrutiny […]

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Posts: sarvepalli legal

state vs irshad

Whether This Case Involves A … vs Salim Musabhai Ghanchu & ors

Ravindra Pyarelal Bidlan And … vs State Of Maharashtra

Sanjay Sthapak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Cnr No. Dlnw01-011368-2017 vs Unknown

RSS MyNation Home Remedies And Tips

  • CORONA ? Home remedies for Cough/Cold and Fever
  • URINE – Water of Life, Fountain of Youth, Potion of beauty
  • Homemade oil for Soft Smooth beautiful Skin
  • How to remove gum from hair
  • Mirror, Window, and Faucet cleaner
Blog at WordPress.com.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: