Skip to content

Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation

  • Home
  • Welcome
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • 498a acquittal
  • 498a quash
  • 304b acquittal
  • quash against relatives
  • 498a discharge

Fight against Legal Terrorism

  • Home
  • Welcome
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • 498a acquittal
  • 498a quash
  • 304b acquittal
  • quash against relatives
  • 498a discharge

Welcome

This Website is about our struggle against biased laws of India which Supreme Court of India Termed as Legal Terrorism

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit

Recent Posts

  • (no title)
  • (no title)
  • (no title)
  • (no title)
  • Unless the dying declaration is wholly reliable, voluntarily free from all doubts and truthful and further the maker was in fit medical condition, it can not be the basis for conviction. 

Recent Comments

RSS MyNation KnowledgeBase

  • Directed to file the chargesheet within statutory period in connection with FIR of threat for inter-caste couple
  • Object of the bail is to ensure the presence of the accused during the trial is neither to punish the accused by keeping him in jail or to teach him a lesson
  • Breach of terms of contract, criminal action is not contemplated
  • Filing common charge-sheet in case of same accused impermissible
  • In case of improper or unfair investigation, Magistrate can interfere
  • Interim maintenance amount reduced on account of it being ‘excessive’ owing to low income of the husband
  • Section 304­B must be interpreted keeping in mind the legislative intent to curb the social evil of bride burning and dowry demand.
  • Section 304 B – Dowry Death – soon before cannot be interpreted to mean immediately before
  • Section 482 – Guiding principles to be considered in determining whether an FIR could be quashed.
  • Right to speedy trial is implicit in right to fair trial, which is part of right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India

Archives

  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Blog Stats

  • 17,475 hits

Recent Posts: Defamation

Shybimon vs Haridas

  Kerala High Court Shybimon vs Haridas on 22 March, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2918 of 2009() 1. SHYBIMON, S/O.DIVAKARAN, PUTHEN … Petitioner Vs 1. HARIDAS, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, PUTHAN … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.B.PRAMOD For Respondent :SRI.R.AZAD BABU The Hon’ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR Dated :22/03/2010 O R D E R […]

M.K.Varghese Cor Episcopa vs State Of Kerala

Excerpt: PARAGRAPH NO 19. Whether the petitioner is entitled to get the benefit of any of the exceptions provided to Section 499 I.P.C, whether he had made the statements in the writ petition in good faith for protection of his interest etc. are matters which cannot be decided by this Court in this petition filed […]

Cause of action is date of offence not date of acquittal

Excerpt: Punjab-Haryana High Court Yashvant Malhotra vs A.K.Sinha on 20 December, 2019 CRM-M-1992-2017(2 petitions) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) Crl. Misc. No. M-11992-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: December 20, 2019 Yashvant Malhotra ….. PETITIONER(s) Versus A.K. Sinha ….RESPONDENT(s) Crl. Misc. No.M-13649 of 2017 (O&M) J.N. Parsad ….. PETITIONER(s) […]

Exceptions to defamation are a matter of trial

Excerpt: “First Exception – Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published.- It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a […]

Mohammed Abdulla Khan vs Prakash K

Excerpt: Where defamatory matter is printed (in a newspaper or a book etc.) and sold or offered for sale, whether the owner thereof can be heard to say that he cannot be made vicariously liable for the defamatory material carried by his newspaper etc. requires a critical examination. 27. Each case requires a careful scrutiny […]

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Posts: sarvepalli legal

state vs irshad

Whether This Case Involves A … vs Salim Musabhai Ghanchu & ors

Ravindra Pyarelal Bidlan And … vs State Of Maharashtra

Sanjay Sthapak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Cnr No. Dlnw01-011368-2017 vs Unknown

RSS MyNation Home Remedies And Tips

  • CORONA ? Home remedies for Cough/Cold and Fever
  • URINE – Water of Life, Fountain of Youth, Potion of beauty
  • Homemade oil for Soft Smooth beautiful Skin
  • How to remove gum from hair
  • Mirror, Window, and Faucet cleaner
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy