Limbraj vs state of maharashtra…

Excerpt: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL  APPEAL NO.  36 OF 2001 01. Limbraj s/i Vishnu Dhakane, age 41 years, occup. Agriculture, r/o Sarul, Tq. Kaij, District Beed. 02. Bysakhu w/o Vishnu Dhakne, age 66 years, occupation : Agril. r/of Sarul, Tq. Kaij, District Beed. 03. Vishnu s/o Baburao Dhakne, age 71 years, occup. agriculture, r/of Sarul, Tq. and District Beed. 04. Youvraj s/o Vishnu Dhakne, age 36 years, occup. agriculture, r/o Sarul, Tq. Kaij, District Beed. 05. Dhanraj s/o Vishnu Dhakne, age 20 years, occup. agriculture,    Appellants/ r/o Sarul, Tq. Kaij, District Beed.    orig. accused. versus The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer,    Respondent/ Police Station, Kaij, Dist.Beed.    orig. complainant Shri S.P. Katneshwarkar, Advocate, for appellants. Shri V.G. Shelke, A.P.P. for the  RespondentState. ::: Downloaded on – 20/09/2016 23:17:03 ::: Bombay High Court 2 criapl-36.01 Coram :      Shrihari  P.  Davare,   J. Judgment   reserved   on : 23.3.2011 Judgment pronounced on:  06.4.2011 Judgment (Per : Shrihari P. Davare, J.) 01. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 02.This is an appeal, preferred by original accused Nos. 1 to 5,challenging the conviction and sentence inflicted upon them, byway of judgment and order dated 29.1.2000, renderd d by learnedII Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, in Sessions Case No.59 of … Continue reading Limbraj vs state of maharashtra…

498a quashed on territorial jurisdiction and absurd allegations

Excerpt: The sequence of facts and circumstances as disclosed above, furnishes an inescapable impression that the incident is said to have taken place at Agra, has been introduced only with a view to sue the applicants at the complainant’ s place in Agra. If we exclude this incident of Marpit, which is said to have … Continue reading 498a quashed on territorial jurisdiction and absurd allegations

Improved Allegations Are Immaterial

  Full judgment: IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR Date of Decision: 9-5-2007 CRL.M.C.204/07 Smt. Kamna Chauhan….. Petitioner Through: Shri. Rajesh Shukla, Advocate versus THE STATE (Madhya Pradesh) and Ors…..Respondents Shri. M. Bhardwaj, Advocate for State. The instant revision is for impugning the order dated 19th February 2007 passed by the Sessions judge, … Continue reading Improved Allegations Are Immaterial

Manish Ratan & Ors vs State Of M.P. & Anr

Excerpt: Supreme Court of India Manish Ratan & Ors vs State Of M.P. & Anr on 1 November, 2006 Author: S.B. Sinha Bench: S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 210 of 2000 PETITIONER: Manish Ratan & Ors. RESPONDENT: State of M.P. & Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/11/2006 BENCH: S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju … Continue reading Manish Ratan & Ors vs State Of M.P. & Anr

AMARENDU JYOTI & ORS. …. APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF CHHATISGARH & ORS. …. RESPONDENTS

Excerpt: REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 546 OF 2009   AMARENDU JYOTI & ORS. .... APPELLANTS   VERSUS   STATE OF CHHATISGARH & ORS. .... RESPONDENTS   JUDGMENT     S. A. BOBDE, J.     1. The appellant no. 1 - Amarendu Jyoti, who is husband … Continue reading AMARENDU JYOTI & ORS. …. APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF CHHATISGARH & ORS. …. RESPONDENTS